Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  Not So Bad
Posted Under: Government • Industrial Production - Cap Utilization • Inflation • Markets • Monday Morning Outlook • Interest Rates • Spending • Stocks

You don’t have to go very far to find lots of negative commentary in the popular press about the current state of the US economy.  High gas prices (due to a “war of choice”) are squeezing consumers’ budgets, and so the economy is headed for a ditch.  Many economists look back at history and blame lots of recessions on oil prices alone.

In terms of the official inflation reports, the popular narrative has a point.  Over time, inflation is a monetary phenomenon, but in the very short term an oil price spike can change measured inflation because consumers (and businesses) dip into savings temporarily to spend more and the basket of goods and services used to measure inflation doesn’t immediately change.  

As a result, the Consumer Price Index is up 3.8% from a year ago, which is well above the Federal Reserve’s 2.0% target.  This will likely keep the Fed from cutting short-term interest rates for at least the next few months.  However, an oil price shock is typically a temporary issue.  And the impact on the economy has been muted.  After adjusting for inflation – things appear not much different than before the war with Iran started.

While events in the Middle East are dramatic, we look at broader macro trends. To us, it’s surprising the economy has not paid more of a price for the reversal of massive COVID stimulus.  Deficits have been relatively stable and the money supply has slowed dramatically.  If the economy slowed, it would be because of this, not an oil price supply shock.

We also think US stocks are overvalued, although saying that repeatedly doesn’t mean they will fall, no matter what our official forecast is.  We are math and model driven, we are not traders and we have no way to judge pure momentum trades.

We also don’t think we’re on the verge of a 1980s-90s style economic boom, in spite of advances in Artificial Intelligence and technological innovation more generally.  

The size of government is substantially larger than it has been anytime during the age of the Internet.  For the past 20-25 years average real growth in the US has been just about 2% per year.  This is less than half the growth the US experienced in the 20 years post-WWII, and it is happening in spite of incredible new technologies that should raise productivity.  More resources being allocated by politicians rather than market forces always slows growth.

So, while we see what some might call malaise because government is such a drain on the economy, the evidence of the economy being on the verge of a recession simply isn’t there, at least not yet.  We appear to still be in the Plow Horse economy phase, where our thoroughbred technological race horse must carry an overweight bloated jockey. 

Real GDP grew at a 2.0% annual rate in the first quarter, and we think is growing at about a 3.0% annual rate so far in the second quarter.  The Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank’s GDP Now Model is even more optimistic for Q2, now projecting growth at a 4.3% rate.

In the meantime, initial claims for jobless benefits have averaged a very low 203,000 the last four weeks, lower than they were a year ago, six months ago, and three months ago.  Yes, job growth has slowed, but we think this is largely related to the shift to roughly net zero immigration over the past year or so.

Manufacturing production is up 1.2% from a year ago, which is not great, but not a sign of recession, either.  For comparison, manufacturing was down at a 0.4% annual rate in the ten years that ended in April 2025.

We get a report on April durable goods orders on Thursday and expect a big number, led by more aircraft orders.  Yes, aircraft orders are volatile from month to month, but airlines ordering more planes suggest they see through the fog of the recent conflict and all is not gloomy ahead.

Yes, much of recent economic growth is being led by AI and data centers, so a case can be made that economic growth is not very broad.  But at least the limited boom in AI and data centers is coming primarily from market forces, not government-directed malinvestment like housing in the early 2000s, or government-sponsored “green energy” of recent years.  

All is not well with the US economy, but the narrative of doom and gloom is being oversold as well.

Brian S. Wesbury – Chief Economist
Robert Stein, CFA – Deputy Chief Economist

Click here for a PDF version

Posted on Tuesday, May 26, 2026 @ 10:51 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Three on Thursday - Tariff Refunds Underway
Housing Starts Declined 2.8% in April
Making the Fed Great Again
Industrial Production Increased 0.7% in April
Three on Thursday - A Closer Look at the Unemployment Rate
Retail Sales Rose 0.5% in April
The Producer Price Index (PPI) Rose 1.4% in April
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) Rose 0.6% in April
Existing Home Sales Increased 0.2% in April
The Bull Case is Largely Based on Hope
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20262026
Expand 20252025
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  First Trust Funds Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2026 All rights reserved.