Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  Housing Starts Rose 10.8% in March
Posted Under: Data Watch • Home Starts • Housing
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 

Implications: Homebuilding surprised to the upside in March, as housing starts beat even the most optimistic forecast of any economics group surveyed by Bloomberg, rising 10.8% to a fifteen-month high.  However, part of the rise represents a bounce back from February, when starts fell 3.0% after unusually snowy conditions in parts of the country weighed on activity.  Starts rose in all major regions in March, with both the single family and multi-unit categories contributing.  Single-family starts rose 9.7% in March and are up 8.9% in the past year, while multi-unit starts rose 13.3% and are up 15.5% in the past year.  Does this mean we are the verge of a boom in home building?  Unlikely. Further down the pipeline, permits for new builds fell 10.8% to a 1.372 million annual rate, lagging consensus expectations. Both the single-family and multi-unit categories contributed to the decline in March and are down 7.9% and 6.3%, respectively, in the past twelve months. Meanwhile, home completions have dropped, ticking up only 0.1% in March after falling 6.3% in February, and now sitting at a 1.366 million annual rate, 12.8% lower than they were a year ago.  Meanwhile, the total number of homes under construction has fallen 9.8% in the last twelve months.  In the past, like in the early 1990s and mid-2000s, this type of decline was associated with a housing bust and falling home prices.  But with the brief exception of COVID, the US has consistently started too few homes almost every year since 2007.  So, while multiple headwinds may hold back housing starts (high home prices, tariffs that raise building costs, restrictive local building regulations, immigration enforcement that makes it difficult to find or replace workers, and the largest completed single-family home inventory since 2009), a lack of construction since the last housing bust should keep national average home prices elevated.  Recent home price data reflects that view, as the FHFA index was unchanged in February but is up 1.7% in the past year, while the national Case-Shiller index rose 0.1% in February and is up 0.7% from a year ago.  In other recent news, the M2 measure of the money supply grew 0.3% in March and is up 4.6% from a year ago – still below its historical growth rate of about 6%.

Click here for a PDF version

Posted on Wednesday, April 29, 2026 @ 11:26 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
New Orders for Durable Goods Rose 0.8% in March
GDP: Mediocre Top-Line, Weaker Details
Three on Thursday - S&P 500 Index EPS, Explained
Retail Sales Rose 1.7% in March
Modest Government Spending Shrinkage
Three on Thursday - Tax Day Reality Check: The Data on Who Pays
Industrial Production Declined 0.5% in March
The Producer Price Index (PPI) Rose 0.5% in March
Existing Home Sales Declined 3.6% in March
Rate Cuts on Backburner
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20262026
Expand 20252025
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  First Trust Funds Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2026 All rights reserved.