Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  No Conviction
Posted Under: Employment • Government • Inflation • Research Reports • Fed Reserve • Interest Rates
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 

In what is supposed to be Jerome Powell’s next to last meeting as chairman, there was plenty for the FOMC to discuss, but little action taken.  As expected, there was no rate cut at today’s meeting, but changes to economic projections and comments at the press conference gave some light into how the Fed is processing political and geopolitical events, and how those events are shaping the Fed’s outlook.

The only notable change in the Statement from January was the addition of a new sentence stating the “implications of developments in the Middle East for the U.S. economy are uncertain.”  Notably Fed Governor Miran once again voted against today’s decision to keep rates unchanged, preferring a 0.25% rate cut. Governor Waller, who also dissented in favor of a cut back in January, voted with the remaining FOMC members to keep rates unchanged.  

Moving to the Summary of Economic Projections (the “dot plots”) shows inflation concerns rising, but anticipated to be short-lived.  The Fed’s preferred PCE inflation measure is now forecast to rise 2.7% in 2026, versus a 2.4% forecast back in December. But inflation is still expected to move toward the longer-run 2.0% inflation target by the end of 2027.  At the same time, the Fed slightly upgraded the outlook for GDP for 2026 (to 2.4% from 2.3%) as well as for each of the next two years.  The unemployment rate forecast for 2026 remained unchanged.  

The question now becomes, should the Fed react to what they expect is a temporary inflation impact and largely outside of their control?  Early in the press conference, Powell made a surprisingly transparent and honest comment that even the FOMC is taking today’s forecasts with a grain of salt, stating that many members have “no conviction” on how things will evolve and therefore moved little from what they had forecast before events in Iran began. 

Instead, the Fed is focused on goods inflation and watching if tariff-related price increases from last year roll off in 2026. It’s a bit odd the emphasis the Fed continues to put on goods inflation, considering PCE goods prices rose 1.3% in the twelve months ending in January, compared to 3.5% inflation in the less tariff-exposed services sector.  Yet when this stubbornly high services inflation, most notably in the “super-core” inflation category (PCE services excluding energy and housing) that the Fed itself created during COVID came up during Q&A, Powell largely dismissed it, saying simply that it’s frustrating these prices haven’t declined, but they should come down eventually.  Apparently if it doesn’t fit the Fed narrative of the day, it’s not worth dwelling on.

Finally, Powell addressed his future with the Fed.  In the event that a new Chair is not confirmed before Powell’s term ends on May 15th, he will stick around and continue to serve his role until a replacement is appointed. He also stated that he has no intention of leaving the Federal Reserve Board of Governors until his ongoing investigation with the Department of Justice is well and truly behind him.  As a reminder, his term as Fed Chair ends mid-May, but his seat on the Board of Governors runs through January of 2028. It’s unusual for a Fed Chair not to vacate their seat on the board when their Chairmanship is up, but it is not required, and Powell may linger at the Fed for the foreseeable future.     

What should you takeaway from today’s meeting?  The Fed isn’t sure how the economy, inflation, or the employment market will react to events in Iran, and they aren’t interested in guessing.  There are six weeks between now and the next FOMC meeting at the end of April, and by then we should have a much better idea of both the magnitude and duration of the economic ripples out of the Middle East. In terms of inflation, we still believe that the M2 money supply is a much more reliable tool for forecasting sustained inflation. To track our ongoing analysis of how oil flows, tariffs, employment, and the money supply are impacting the outlook for the United States, we would encourage you to keep an eye on our Three on Thursday publications.

Brian S. Wesbury – Chief Economist

Robert Stein – Deputy Chief Economist

Click here for a PDF version

Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2026 @ 4:29 PM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
The Producer Price Index (PPI) Rose 0.7% in February
Industrial Production Increased 0.2% in February
War, Oil, and Recession
Real GDP Growth in Q4 Was Revised Lower to a 0.7% Annual Rate
New Orders for Durable Goods Were Unchanged in January
Personal Income Rose 0.4% in January
Three on Thursday - Hormuz, Oil Flows, and the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve
Housing Starts Rose 7.2% in January
The Trade Deficit in Goods and Services Came in at $54.5 Billion in January
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) Rose 0.3% in February
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20262026
Expand 20252025
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  First Trust Funds Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2026 All rights reserved.