Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  The ISM Non-Manufacturing Index Increased to 52.6 in November
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 

Implications:  The resiliency of the sector responsible for the lion’s share of US output was on display once again in November, as the ISM Services index beat consensus expectations and rose to a nine-month high of 52.6.  Despite continued weakness in its counterpart survey on manufacturing, the service sector has expanded in ten out of the last twelve months.  The modest uptick in the headline index was largely driven by the supplier deliveries component, which surged to a thirteen-month high of 54.1 (a reading above 50 signals longer wait times), likely the result of air traffic disruptions stemming from the government shutdown according to the report.  Partially offsetting this gain was a pullback in the new orders index which remains in expansion territory at 52.6.  Survey comments indicate a fractured growth picture, as some voice concerns about the impacts of additional tariffs and another potential government shutdown in January, while others indicate business as usual.  Notably, a survey comment from the Retail Trade industry wrote, “Business continues to be strong, driven by customer traffic. Pricing stable.”  Still, this bumpy path has kept service companies defensive in their hiring efforts.  The employment index continued to signal contraction in the service sector in November (but at slower pace compared to last month), with the category rising from 48.2 to 48.9.  That makes eight out of the last nine months where the employment index has been below 50.  Service companies – once hamstrung with difficulty finding labor – have begun reducing their headcounts, with more industries (eight) reporting lower employment in November than higher (six).  Finally, the highest reading of any category was once again the prices index, which fell to a seven-month low of 65.4.  Though the index remains elevated, it is still far from the worst we saw during the COVID supply-chain disruptions, when the index reached the low 80s.  While inflation pressures remain, the M2 measure of the money supply has grown very slowly over the past three years.  Last week's data showed M2 rose 0.4% in October and 4.7% over twelve months – below the historical growth rate of ~6% – suggesting lower inflation and growth in the year ahead.  In other news this morning, ADP reported private payrolls declined 32,000 in November, which should translate into a tepid official Labor Department report for job growth last month.

Click here for a PDF version

Posted on Wednesday, December 3, 2025 @ 1:48 PM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Industrial Production Increased 0.1% in September
The ISM Manufacturing Index Declined to 48.2 in November
Inflation Does Not Fix Anything, Especially Debt
New Orders for Durable Goods Rose 0.5% in September
Retail Sales Rose 0.2% in September
The Producer Price Index (PPI) Rose 0.3% in September
No Home Price "Collapse"
Three On Thursday - U.S. Natural Gas Exports Keep Hitting Records
Existing Home Sales Increased 1.2% in October
Nonfarm Payrolls Increased 119,000 in September
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20252025
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2025 All rights reserved.