Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  Trade Clouds Parting
Posted Under: Monday Morning Outlook • Trade

Trade disputes have been an ongoing soap opera since President Trump took office.  From steel tariffs to trade skirmishes with China, Japan, Canada, Mexico, South Korea, and the European Union, among others,  it's been hard to keep track! 

But over the past few months we think a trend toward settlement of these disputes has emerged.  Congress must still act on the new version of NAFTA with Mexico and Canada – USMCA – but as Democrats in the House of Representatives consider impeaching the president, they should also become more interested in showing they're not only interested in all scandal, all the time.  Passing some broad bi-partisan legislation and USMCA would be a good start.  Look for it to get passed by early 2020, putting our disputes with our two largest export markets behind us.
 
From the perspective of US economic growth, the relationship with China has received way too much attention in the past couple of years.  Even before the trade dispute started, US exports to China were a smaller share of our GDP than exports to Japan were before the Japanese economy went into a long-term funk in the early 1990s.  If the US could prosper in the 1990s in spite of Japan's problems, the US economy overall should be able to absorb softer demand for our products coming from China, which lags well behind Canada and Mexico as an export market.

But last week's news indicates a deal is getting close.  It will not be a huge deal that comprehensively puts all our trade issues with China to rest; not even close.  But it will likely mean no new additional restrictions from now through 2020, and some rolling back of tariffs put in place in the last couple of years.

Meanwhile, the US recently concluded a trade deal with Japan.

None of this suggests we are fully out of the woods on trade issues.  We doubt China will stop its theft of intellectual property, and so, expect a trade dispute with China to re-emerge in 2021 no matter who wins the presidential election next year.  In the meantime, tariffs and the threat of other economic sanctions on China were always more damaging to China than the US.  That's why we never worried as much as the conventional wisdom.      

But nothing that's happened in the last few years suggest we are entering some sort of Smoot-Hawley-like downward spiral in international trade.  US merchandise imports dropped 70% from 1929 to 1932 while exports dropped 69%.  That's a downward spiral!  US imports didn't reach 1929 levels again until 1946.

By contrast, even before the recent trade deals with Mexico, Canada, and Japan have been implemented, US trade with the rest of the world has been rising.  In the past twelve months, exports and imports of goods and services combined have been $5.65 trillion, versus $5.63 trillion in calendar 2018, $5.26 trillion in 2017, and $4.93 trillion in 2016.  Even without deals, trade could be hitting a record high this year.      

The US economy has been and will continue to be much more resilient than many think.  Trade has increased uncertainty, but was never as big a threat as feared.  And, as trade relations improve, stocks will make up lost ground.  We were never as worried as the conventional wisdom, and now it will come around. 

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist
Robert Stein, CFA – Deputy Chief Economist

Click here for PDF version

Posted on Monday, October 14, 2019 @ 11:33 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.