Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  Home Sales Overcounted
Posted Under: Data Watch • Home Sales • Housing
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 
You've heard about it.  But, it's not as scary as they say.

When the National Association of Realtors (NAR) issues its latest report on existing home sales next week (9 am central time, Wednesday, December 21), it's likely to show substantial downward revisions for both the pace of sales and the number of existing homes in inventory, dating back to 2007.  Some see this as horrible news about the economy, but the changes are really not important at all.

First, as the chart shows, over the past several years existing home sales have not fallen nearly as much as either new home sales or housing starts.  (The chart is indexed so that each indicator's average level in 2005 equals 100.)  For example, while existing home sales are now roughly 30% below the 2005 average, new home sales are down about 75% and housing starts are down around 70%.  In other words, it's something we have noticed and wondered about.  All a downward revision for existing home sales will do is move them closer to what other indicators were already saying about the housing sector.  We have been saying for some time that a "normal" pace of existing home sales would be about 5.5 million per year.  So far this year, sales have averaged just shy of 5.0 million, which seemed oddly good given that it may take several more years for the housing sector as a whole to return to normal.   
 
Second, according to the NAR, the downward revisions to sales (because of double counting or population estimates) will be matched by a downward revision to inventories.  This will leave the months' supply of existing homes – how many months it would take to clear out the current inventory, at the current pace of sales – roughly unchanged.  In addition, prices will not be revised.
Third, and perhaps most important, is that existing home sales make almost no difference for economic growth.  If you remember Econ 101, GDP only counts new production, not the re-sales of used items.  Selling an existing home is just a transfer of an asset from one owner to another, and does not reflect the current production of goods and services.  The only part of this transaction that impacts economic data is the commission earned by a realtor. 

There are several reasons for next week's benchmark revision, including changes in coverage areas for the multiple-listing services (MLSs), shifts in population across coverage areas, a drop in the share of sales by owner, the seeping of some new home sales into MLSs, and the recording of some sales on more than one MLS.  In 2005, another benchmark revision by NAR reduced 1999 sales by 11%.  That was not considered important news for the economy and neither should the revision next week.   
 
Posted on Wednesday, December 14, 2011 @ 3:39 PM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Fed Less Gloomy on Economy, No Change in Policy
Retail sales grew 0.2% in November
Obama's 8%: Sounds Right
The Fed’s Report on Household Balance Sheets
The trade deficit in goods and services shrank to $43.5 billion in October
Initial Claims Continue to Improve
Long-time Investor Very Bullish on Equities
Payrolls Consistently Revised Upward
Retailers Running Lean and Mean
ISM services index down slightly, but details show strength
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.