|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
|
|
Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
|
|
 | ISM services index down slightly, but details show strength |
|
| Posted Under: Data Watch • ISM |
Implications: The headline number for the ISM services index disappointed this morning, falling short of consensus expectations and dipping to the lowest level in almost two years. At 52, the headline index still shows expansion, but a gradual one. However, we think the headline number is highly misleading. The details of the report show the service sector is re-accelerating. The business activity index, which has a stronger correlation with real GDP growth than the overall index, rebounded to 56.2 in November from 53.8. The new orders index increased as well. As we've said before, the ISM surveys can sometimes reflect the vagaries of business sentiment rather than actual levels of output, and this is likely to be the case with the drop in the headline report for November, when fears about Europe were rampant. The employment sub-index dropped below 50, but since we already have payroll data from November, this is not relevant information. On the inflation front, the prices paid index rose to 62.5 after dipping down to 57.1 last month. Inflation pressures are building with each day that the Federal Reserve clings to loose monetary policy. More monetary action and quantitative easing would be a mistake and would make the inflation problem worse.
|
|
|
These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
|
|
Archive
Search by Topic
|
|
|
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
|