Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  Risk Management
Posted Under: Employment • GDP • Government • Inflation • Markets • Fed Reserve • Interest Rates • Bonds • Stocks
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 

The Federal Reserve cut rates by 0.25% today, citing a rising risk to the employment side of their dual mandate.  While that was no surprise, there were many questions on where the Fed would go from here, and what it would take to accelerate or slow the pace of policy adjustment. 

Starting with the Fed statement, the most notable change from July came in highlights to the weakening employment picture.  While there was no direct reference here to the 911,000 job downward revision to nonfarm payrolls that the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced last week for the twelve months ending in March, new text was added that “job gains have slowed” and “the downside risks to employment have risen.”  Inflation does still remain a concern, with a comment added that inflation has moved up since the last meeting, but there was across the board agreement from voting members that it was appropriate to resume the rate-cut process.  There was one dissent among voters, as newly appointed Fed Governor Stephen Miran would have preferred a 0.5% cut today.     

In an odd twist, the release of updated forecasts on the path of rates, inflation, employment, and GDP (the so-called “dot plots”) shows the Fed expects stronger employment but higher inflation risk moving forward. Compared to their forecasts in June, the Fed is expecting faster economic growth for this year, with no change to the outlook for inflation or the unemployment rate in 2025. But starting in 2026, the Fed now expects the unemployment rate to be 0.1% lower than previously estimated, while inflation and growth forecasts were each raised by 0.2%.  Along with these changes, the dot plots signal Fed voters now expect two more rate cuts by year end (so three cuts including today, versus an expectation of two cuts total back in June), with 2026 and 2027 forecast to see just one cut each year of 0.25%.   It’s possible that forecasters are simply anticipating that the rate cuts they are projecting will spur improvement in the labor market while also putting upward pressure on inflation, but it’s important to remember that the Fed’s track record with forecasts is less than stellar. We believe that inflation will moderate and employment continues to grow at a very modest pace. Only time will tell.

During the press conference, Chair Powell faced questions on everything from political independence to the reliability of employment data. Arguably the most important comment came when Chair Powell was asked if today’s rate cut should be viewed as an insurance policy against the risk of further deterioration in the labor market or if the dynamics for a downturn are already here.  In Chair Powell’s words, today’s move could be viewed as a “risk management cut”.  As mentioned above, the Fed has raised their GDP growth outlook for this year as well as the years ahead, and they are primarily reacting to data suggesting employment was and remains weaker than previously believed.  In response, they are shifting from a restrictive monetary policy focused on bringing down inflation, towards a neutral policy that balances inflation and employment concerns.  If employment data improves, the Fed could just as quickly stop cuts and put inflation back at the forefront.           

As ever, the path forward from here will depend on the data, but another rate cut looks likely when the Fed meets again in late October.   Two more rate cuts this year sounds about right.  If we had to put an over/under on the Fed’s projected single rate cut in 2026, we would take the over, as a slowed pace of M2 growth impacts both the inflation data and – along with immigration changes, potential moderation in tech hiring related to AI, and slower/negative government hiring following outsized growth over recent years – the employment picture.  We would love to see a productivity boom and a resurgence in broad-based business hiring, but expect some adjustment pains as the economy continues to move away from short-term growth driven by government stimulus towards a better mix of policy and spending with private markets at the helm.          

Brian S. Wesbury – Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA – Deputy Chief Economist

Click here for a PDF version

Posted on Wednesday, September 17, 2025 @ 4:26 PM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Housing Starts Declined 8.5% in August
Industrial Production Increased 0.1% in August
Retail Sales Rose 0.6% in August
So, Maybe That Drop In M2 Really Did Matter
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) Rose 0.4% in August
Three on Thursday - BLS Payroll Revisions Slash Job Gains by Nearly a Million
The Producer Price Index (PPI) Declined 0.1% in August
Immigration, Tariffs, and AI, Oh My!
Nonfarm Payrolls Increased 22,000 in August
Three on Thursday - Electric Vehicle Adoption Around the Globe
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20252025
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2025 All rights reserved.