Home   Logon   Mobile Site   Research and Commentary   About Us   Call 1.800.621.1675 or Email Us       Follow Us: 

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Click for Bio
Follow Brian on Twitter Follow Brian on LinkedIn View Videos on YouTube
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Click for Bio
Follow Bob on Twitter Follow Bob on LinkedIn View Videos on YouTube
 
  Nonfarm Payrolls Increased 467,000 in January
Posted Under: CPI • Data Watch • Employment • Government • Inflation • Fed Reserve • Interest Rates • COVID-19

 
Implications:  We're going to cut to the chase: although there were some very strong headlines on the employment situation in January, the report was not nearly as strong as many analysts are making it out to be.  Here's the good news: nonfarm payrolls rose 467,000 in January, blowing away the consensus expected 125,000 and higher than the forecast from any economics group.  In addition, payrolls in November/December were revised up a whopping 709,000.  Meanwhile, civilian employment, an alternative measure of jobs that includes small-business start-ups, increased 1,199,000 in January.  Seemingly bucking Omicron, the labor force (people who are either working or looking for work) rose almost 1.4 million.  Workers' wages also shot up, with average hourly earnings up 0.7% in January and up 5.7% from a year ago.  What's not to like?  Well, let's dig a little deeper!  First, the average workweek declined to 34.5 hours in January from 34.7 in December.  As a result, in spite of the strong increase in the payrolls, total hours worked fell 0.3% in January.  That 0.3% decline is the equivalent of losing about 350,000 jobs for the month.  Second, although payrolls were revised up substantially for November/December, that was due to new seasonal adjustment factors generated once a year by the Labor Department; all the extra gains for November/December were simply a shift from June/July.  Third, the great civilian employment number – roughly 1.2 million jobs – was also due to a quirk.  Every January, the Labor Department inserts new Census data on the size of the US population, which affects the numbers on the labor force and employment.  That population adjustment was responsible for all the increase in civilian employment in January; without that quirk, the BLS would have reported a 272,000 drop in civilian employment and a 137,000 decline in the labor force.  We're not suggesting the January employment report was "bad" news; we're just demonstrating that it doesn't deserve the exuberance that the headline payroll number suggests. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.0% in January from 3.9% in December, but that's still a level that will allow the Federal Reserve room to say they are now focused on inflation.  It's also important to note that although wages are growing quickly, total normal worker pay is close to treading water versus inflation.  Average hourly earnings are up a strong 10.7% versus February 2020 (pre-COVID).  But total hours worked are down 1.3% over that same timeframe, leaving total earnings up 9.3%.  That's good, but we estimate consumer prices are up 8.8% over the same period, which means real earnings are up only 0.5% in almost two years. The labor market has made great progress in the past year but is far from fully healed.  Payrolls remain 2.9 million below where they were in February 2020 and we don't expect to get back to pre-COVID levels until the second half of 2022.   

Click here for a PDF version
Posted on Friday, February 4, 2022 @ 11:29 AM • Post Link Share: 
Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2022 All rights reserved.