Home   Logon   Mobile Site   Research and Commentary   About Us   Call 1.800.621.1675 or Email Us       Follow Us: 

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 
 
Blog Home
Jeff Margolin
Closed-End Fund Analyst
Click for Bio

Follow Jeff on LinkedIn
Ryan Issakainen
ETF Strategist
Click for Bio

Follow Ryan on LinkedIn
 

  Are Expense Ratios a Dependable Predictor of Returns for Large Cap US Equity ETFs?
Posted Under: ETFs

In 2010, Morningstar published a study which argued that expense ratios are "the most dependable predictor of performance" for mutual funds.1; This study included roughly 5 years of mutual fund performance data, based upon which the authors recommended that investors focus on the cheapest 40% of mutual funds as a starting point in the due diligence process.  While some have sought to apply similar heuristics to ETFs, the evidence presented below pertaining to US large cap equity ETFs calls into question the sensibility of this application.  Over the past 5 years (as of 2/29/16), the cheapest large cap US equity ETFs have tended to underperform ETFs with higher expense ratios, with significantly fewer funds producing excess returns versus their respective S&P benchmarks.2

Click Here to continue reading.

¹"How Expense Ratios and Star Ratings Predict Success", Morningstar, 8/9/2010.
²Data obtained from Morningstar Direct. Including all ETFs from Large Cap Blend, Large Cap Value, and Large Cap Growth categories, with at least 5 years of performance history on 2/29/16 (80 ETFs).  This necessarily excludes ETFs that existed on 2/28/11, but have since become obsolete (23 ETFs).  While many of these ETFs would have been included in group #3, poor performance does not appear to be the primary cause of their obsolescence, in our opinion.  For the ETFs that would have been included in group #3 that accumulated at least 2 years of operating history (14 of 19 ETFs), 2 of 3 (67%) large cap value ETFs outperformed the S&P 500 Value Index in the 2 years prior to closing, 3 of 5 (60%) large cap growth ETFs outperformed the S&P 500 Growth Index in the 2 years prior to closing, and 1 of 6 (16.7%) outperformed the S&P 500 Index in the 2 years prior to closing.

Posted on Thursday, March 17, 2016 @ 2:48 PM • Post Link Share: 
Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L. P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Staying the Course with FVD
Robust Growth for Municipal Bond ETFs in 2015
4th Quarter 2015 Municipal Market Performance and Highlights
Senior Loan & High Yield Review – 4th Quarter 2015
The Return of Volatility and the Case for Earnings Quality
Municipal Quarterly Update – 3rd Quarter 2015
Third Quater 2015 CEF Review
Senior Loan & High Yield Review
Diversify Your Short Duration Income Portfolio
Municipal Market Update - 2nd Quarter 2015
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial advisors are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA.
First Trust Advisors L.P.
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2019 All rights reserved.