|
|
|
|
|
Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
|
|
Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
|
|
| The trade deficit in goods and services increased to $52.6 billion in January |
|
Posted Under: Data Watch • Trade |
Implications: The trade deficit was larger than the consensus expected in January and the widest since October 2008. The reason was a surge in imports, which hit a new record high. Some of the increase in imports was due to the timing of holidays in China, and so may reverse next month. Exports also rose in January, to nearly a record high. Some analysts are worried about problems in Europe affecting our trade with that region, and both exports and imports fell with the euro area in January. However, the total volume of international trade (exports plus imports) hit a new all-time record high, showing the US economy can overcome problems with Europe, as it did in the early 1990s. This year, the trade deficit is likely to be caught between two powerful opposing forces. First, accelerating economic growth, which puts upward pressure on the trade gap. Second, the large depreciation of the US dollar over the past decade, which should continue to make the US an attractive place from which to export. That's why Japanese automakers are increasingly using the US as an export hub. Meanwhile, companies like Caterpillar, Siemens, and Electrolux are noticing that unit labor costs are very low in the US, resulting in their bringing activity here that was previously done abroad. Our best guess is that the trade deficit expands modestly in 2012.
Click here for a printable version.
|
|
These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
|
|
Archive
Search by Topic
|
|
|
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
|