Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
X •  LinkedIn
  Low Labor Force Participation Rate?...Not So Fast
Posted Under: Data Watch • Employment • Research Reports
Supporting Image for Blog Post

Supporting Image for Blog Post

Supporting Image for Blog Post

In his response to the State of the Union Address last week, Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels said that the "percentage of Americans with a job is the lowest in decades."  This echoes the focus of many bearish analysts on the labor force participation rate, which is the share of the population that is either working or looking for work.  Participation was only 64.1% in 2011, the lowest since 1983.  

The bears don't care that in 2011 private payrolls increased 160,000 per month and the unemployment rate fell almost a full percentage point.  They don't even care that the labor force actually grew.  They argue that the labor force isn't growing fast enough and if it had grown as fast as population growth, the unemployment rate would be significantly higher.

But, even though the labor force participation rate is the lowest in a generation, it is not the negative silver bullet that bearish analysts think.  Data from 1995 and 2005 suggest the participation rate is right about where it should be. 

The second chart shows the participation rates in 1995, 2005, and 2011, both overall and broken down into thirteen different age groups.  Notice how participation tends to rise rapidly until people hit their late 20s, plateaus until around age 50, and then starts to decline into older age groups. 

As our society ages, these demographic and behavioral shifts become more important.  For example, the population of older Americans has increased significantly between 1995 and 2011 (see the third chart).  What's really interesting is that the increase in population is occurring in age groups that typically experience reduced labor force participation.

Back in 1995, the overall participation rate was 66.6%.  However, using participation rates by age group and the number of people in each age group, we can calculate what the overall participation rate would have been in 2011 if people in each age group in 2011 participated just as they had back in 1995.  The answer is 64.7%.  (Click the link below to see the addendum on the second page of the report for a more detailed description of the calculation.)

But the participation rate is also influenced by the business cycle.  In general, when the unemployment rate is higher, participation rates tend to be lower, and vice-versa.  In the past 20 years, a one percentage point change in the jobless rate is, on average, associated with a 0.133 change in the participation rate in the opposite direction.  Back in 1995, the unemployment rate averaged 5.6%, compared to 9% in 2011.  So the higher unemployment rate of 2011 should have pushed down the participation rate by an additional 0.5 percentage points.

In other words, if we had been asked back in 1995 what the participation rate would be in 2011 if the jobless rate were 9% and if every age group maintained the same participation rate as in 1995, we would have said 64.2%, almost exactly the 64.1% that actually prevailed in 2011. 

Using numbers for 2005 generates similar results.  If every age group had the same participation rates in 2011 that they had back in 2005, the participation rate would be 64.9%.  Applying the increase in the unemployment rate between 2005 and 2011 suggests a further reduction in the participation rate to 64.4%, again very close to the 64.1% we actually experienced.

The US labor market is far from perfect.  Better public policies during the past several years would have generated a much lower unemployment rate.  These include less government spending, less political direction of capital investment, and less regulation.   But there's nothing about the participation rate that says the labor market is operating worse than the official statistics show.

Click here to view a printable version.
Posted on Thursday, February 2, 2012 @ 11:02 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.