Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  The Trade Deficit in Goods and Services Came in at $43.6 Billion in February
Posted Under: Data Watch • Trade
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 

Implications: When President Trump views today's trade numbers he will be happy as the trade deficit narrowed to a four-month low in February.  But what really matters, and what President Trump and other policymakers should be focused on, is the total volume of trade – imports plus exports – which signals how much value consumers find in the global economy.  Today's report showed the volume of trade declined in February as imports fell by $4.3 billion while exports grew only $0.4 billion.  It is not unusual to see large declines in imports in February as China basically shuts down for a few weeks during the Chinese New Year. In fact, merchandise imports from China were down $8.6 billion in February, the biggest decline on record.  Some argue today's trade deficits must be offset by future trade surpluses.  We beg to differ.  The US finances trade deficits with foreign capital inflows.  The trade deficit equals net foreign investment and foreign investors have been willing to be paid a very low return on their US investments.  So low that Americans still earn more on their investments abroad than foreign investors earn on their US assets.  As long as that continues, and we see no reason why it shouldn't, the US can continue to run trade deficits.  Moreover, many of the policies President Trump is pursuing, including cutting tax rates and allowing for construction of more energy infrastructure, will make the US an even stronger magnet for capital from abroad.  Nonetheless, the US should become much more competitive.  Just look at the energy markets.  A decade ago, our petroleum product imports were about nine times our exports.  Now these imports are 1.7 times exports.  In late November, OPEC decided to cut oil production by more than 1 million BPD (barrels per day).  Since then, prices have increased and, as a result, oil production in the United States has increased by 450,000 BPD, taking market share from unstable, less free-market countries.  The ability of US producers to respond to market prices outside of government control is also why oil prices have not spiked back to old highs.  The US has become an important global petroleum producer, bringing a stabilizing effect to the world.  In other news yesterday, automakers reported sales of cars and light trucks at 16.6 million annual rate in March, down 5.4% from February and down 0.3% from a year ago.  We expect a strong pace of sales, on average, in 2017, but not quite as strong as 2015-16.  Instead, consumers will spend their growing incomes on other consumer discretionary items.

Click here for PDF version

Posted on Tuesday, April 4, 2017 @ 10:04 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
The ISM Manufacturing Index Declined to 57.2 in March
WSJ Leak: Fed May Shrink Balance Sheet
M2 and C&I Loan Growth
Personal Income Increased 0.4% in February
Real GDP Growth in Q4 was Revised up to a 2.1% Annual Rate
M2 and C&I Loan Growth
The Fed is A Proxy for Government
New Orders for Durable Goods Rose 1.7% in February
New Single-Family Home Sales Increased 6.1% in February
Existing Home Sales Declined 3.7% in February
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.