Home   Logon   Mobile Site   Research and Commentary   About Us   Call 1.800.621.1675 or Email Us       Follow Us: 

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Click for Bio
Follow Brian on Twitter Follow Brian on LinkedIn View Videos on YouTube
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Click for Bio
Follow Bob on Twitter Follow Bob on LinkedIn View Videos on YouTube
 
  Net Neutrality Repeal Won’t Lead to Internet Apocalypse
Posted Under: Government • Productivity

In a clear sign the pendulum is swinging the other way, this afternoon the FCC voted to reduce its regulatory power and put an end to net neutrality.  By repealing Obama era regulations governing Internet service providers (ISPs), government oversight will now return to a more "light touch" approach.  Anyone that has been online in the past few weeks has probably come across the dire predictions of advocates of these regulations.  When repealed, its argued, the internet will cease to be the open and free landscape that has fostered so much innovation.  The dystopian future would instead belong to monopolists who would shut down competition and nickel and dime customers for individual websites and essential services.  We believe this view to be both alarmist and completely unfounded.

Even though the repeal effort has been framed as a massive giveaway to large corporations, it's important to remember this is simply a return to pre-2015 regulations.  This means ISPs would no longer be subject to FCC oversight through "title II" rules under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.  Further, there was no evidence of widespread abuse by ISPs leading up to the new rules being adopted in 2015. The changes were instead made based on the theoretical chance that abuse could happen in the future, setting a dangerous regulatory precedent.  

Many argue that any step that we can take to protect against bad behavior is worth taking.  However, regulation always has unintended consequences. The forgone opportunities from shifting resources from productive uses to compliance harms innovation and regulatory capture means more market power for the very companies that you set out to check.  In many cases, government taxes and regulations effectively limit competition.  Large incumbents can afford the costs of compliance while their smaller competitors can't.  Lobbyists don't come cheap either, and are able to ensure that new laws and regulations favor established ISPs.

Finally, a major reason there is only one ISP in many localities, raising the specter of monopoly in the first place, is the result of prohibitive costs imposed by local governments.  Companies must pay exorbitant amounts for "rights of way", the ability to run cable under public and private streets or buildings.  On top of this, exclusive licensing agreements that include kickbacks like expanding service where it's not demanded or providing free broadband to government buildings are business as usual.  These practices either reduce incentives for competitors to challenge the incumbent or keep them out altogether.  If the main goal is to keep bad behavior from happening, competition is the best solution, which means these local government practices need to be reformed.  Further, centralized approval of pricing and service plans through the FCC will inevitably slow down the rollout of alternative forms of internet delivery.  High speed satellite internet, for example, stands to benefit small and rural localities with no options the most.

Many advocates of net neutrality cite the goal of keeping the internet as a virtual "wild west."  It's ironic then that they're also the ones calling for the arrival of a sheriff.  Considering the FCC's institutional history of censorship, giving it control over the biggest innovation in the distribution of free and open information should also give pause.  Before net neutrality rules were adopted in 2015, internet access and speed for the average person had done nothing but expand and accelerate, and there's no reason to believe that will change after a repeal.  Further, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai deserves applause for being a rare example of a regulator working to reduce his own power. Markets and competition, not government, are what have driven the incredible innovation we have seen through the internet, and a repeal of these rules means that innovation is here to stay. 

Bryce Gill – Economic Analyst      


Posted on Thursday, December 14, 2017 @ 12:16 PM • Post Link Share: 
Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L. P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. First Trust has no knowledge of and has not been provided any information regarding any investor. Financial advisors must determine whether particular investments are appropriate for their clients. First Trust believes the financial advisor is a fiduciary, is capable of evaluating investment risks independently and is responsible for exercising independent judgment with respect to its retirement plan clients.
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA.
First Trust Advisors L.P.
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2018 All rights reserved.