Home   Logon   Mobile Site   Research and Commentary   About Us   Call 1.800.621.1675 or Email Us       Follow Us: 

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Click for Bio
Follow Brian on Twitter Follow Brian on LinkedIn View Videos on YouTube
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Click for Bio
Follow Bob on Twitter Follow Bob on LinkedIn View Videos on YouTube
 
  Housing Regulation Hurdles
Posted Under: Home Sales • Housing

Housing, the economic sector that started its crash in late 2005, and which is often cited as the driver of the financial market collapse that followed, has seen a steady if unspectacular recovery. The pace of housing starts, as well as sales of new and existing homes, continue to climb higher. It's had to, because the US needs new homes, and employment growth and income gains have continued while household financial obligations (recurring monthly payments as a percent of after-tax income) remain near multi-decade lows. However, tight lending markets have held back the pace of recovery. So have low inventories of houses available for sale. But there is another, often overlooked factor – rising regulatory costs.   

According to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the average cost of regulatory compliance to home builders for new construction has increased a staggering 30% since 2011. This closely mirrors an increase of 34% over the same time period in the average cost of a new home. In fact, the cost of regulation per home now stands at roughly $85,000 or about 24% of the final sticker price of an average new single-family home. Examples of typical regulations include local impact fees, environmental mitigation, storm-water discharge permits and ever changing construction codes that, on average, builders say add 6.6 months to the development process. This squeezes builders at the margin, and is a driving factor in the movement away from the construction of cheaper starter homes in favor of premium models.

This lack of supply to the lower end of the market has hit first-time buyers the hardest, effectively pricing many people out of the opportunity to own a home. In a recent blog post, Trulia.com's Chief Economist reported that the inventory of "starter" homes (defined as homes with values in the lower third nationally) has fallen 44% since 2012, and median prices in that segment of the market have risen by 32%.  The result is that the share of first-time buyers in the market dropped to a nearly three decade low in 2015, according to the National Association of Realtors®. This has been part of the reason the housing market has been held back post-recovery, people aren't able to get their foot in the door. Once someone owns a home, even at the lower end of the market, they begin to build equity and are able to eventually trade up. Not only does this stimulate sales for more expensive homes, it puts an existing home on the market and helps alleviate the inventory issue as well.

This is an example of the kind of damage over-the-top regulations can cause to an economy. However, don't expect the government to address these problems at the source. More likely they will continue to raise regulatory costs through micromanagement and respond with government programs that make loans easier to obtain. After all, what could go wrong?    

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist
Robert Stein, CFA – Deputy Chief Economist

Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2016 @ 11:08 AM • Post Link Share: 
Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2020 All rights reserved.