Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  US Needs Sensible Debt Financing
Posted Under: Government • Monday Morning Outlook • Interest Rates • Spending • Taxes

Instead of imposing strict fiduciary rules on Wall Street, banks, investment houses, and financial advisors, the government should apply similar rules to the managers of the federal debt.  This is particularly true because unlike the private sector – which faces tough market competition every day – the debt managers at the Treasury Department have a monopoly. 

These federal debt managers have been flagrantly violating what should be their fiduciary responsibility to manage the debt in the best long-term interests of the US taxpayer.

Despite a roughly $19 trillion federal debt, the interest cost of the debt remains low relative to fundamentals.  In Fiscal Year 2015, interest was 1.2% of GDP and 6.9% of federal revenue, both the lowest since the late 1960s.  To put this in perspective, in 1991 debt service hit a post-World War II peak of 3.2% of GDP and 18.4% of federal revenue.

In other words, for the time being low interest rates have kept down the servicing cost of the debt even as the debt itself has soared.

You would think that in a situation like this, with federal debt set to continue to increase rapidly in the future, that the government's debt managers would bend over backwards to lock-in current low interest rates for as long as possible. 

But you would be wrong.  The average maturity of outstanding marketable Treasury debt (which doesn't include debt held in government Trust Funds, like Social Security) is only 5 years and 9 months.  That's certainly higher than the average maturity of 4 years and 1 month at the end of the Bush Administration, but still way too low given the level of interest rates.    

The government's debt managers have a built-in bias in favor of using short-term debt: because the yield curve normally slopes upward, the government can save a little bit of money each year by issuing shorter term debt.  In turn, that means politicians get to show smaller budget deficits or get to shift spending to pet programs.

But this is short-sighted.  The US government should instead lock-in relatively low interest rates for multiple decades, by issuing more 30-year bonds, and perhaps by introducing bonds that mature in 50 years or even longer.                       

At present, we find ourselves in the fortunate situation of being able to easily pay the interest on the federal debt.  But this isn't going to last forever.  If the government locks-in low rates for an extended period it would give us time to catch our breath and fix our long-term fiscal problems, like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.  

There's no reason this has to be a partisan issue.  The government's debt managers should just treat the debt like it's their own.  If the government is determined to hold many others to a stricter standard, it should lead by example.          

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist
Robert Stein, CFA – Deputy Chief Economist
             

Click here for PDF version

Posted on Monday, March 28, 2016 @ 9:16 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
M2 and C&I Loan Growth
New Orders for Durable Goods Declined 2.8% in February
New Single-Family Home Sales Increased 2.0% in February
Money Misperceptions
Existing Home Sales Declined 7.1% in February
M2 and C&I Loan Growth
Rates Hikes on the Way
Industrial Production Dropped 0.5% in February
Housing Starts Increased 5.2% in February
The Consumer Price Index Declined 0.2% in February
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.