Home   Logon   Mobile Site   Research and Commentary   About Us   Call 1.800.621.1675 or Email Us       Follow Us: 

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Click for Bio
Follow Brian on Twitter Follow Brian on LinkedIn View Videos on YouTube
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Click for Bio
Follow Bob on Twitter Follow Bob on LinkedIn View Videos on YouTube
 
  Cut Spending to Grow Economy
Posted Under: GDP • Government • Monday Morning Outlook • Productivity • Spending

Austan Goolsbee, former Chairman of President Obama's Council of Economic Advisors, was interviewed by Paul Gigot on Fox News this past weekend and asked about slow economic growth.  He argued that "a lack of 'aggregate demand' around the world and in the United States" is reducing business investment and slowing economic growth.

Aggregate Demand is economic code for "spending."  And politicians love to blame a weak economy on a lack of spending.  After all if the economy is weak, then what government leaders need to do is increase the size of government and its spending!

Count us incredulous.  There is absolutely no evidence to back this argument up.  Between 1992 and 2000, the eight years of Bill Clinton's presidency, consumer spending averaged just 65.1% of GDP, but real GDP grew 3.8% annually.

In the past five years, consumer spending has averaged 68.3% of GDP, the highest five-year period in history.  Yet real GDP grew only 2% per year.  In other words, aggregate consumer demand has risen sharply, but the economy is growing more slowly.

And if you think government spending is a solution to this problem, think again.  Between 1992 and 2000, federal government spending averaged 19.2% of GDP.  In the past five years, government spending has averaged 21.5% of GDP.

In other words, both government and consumer spending are higher as a share of GDP today than they were in the 1990s, yet real GDP growth is slower.  Demand is not the problem.  It's supply that's the problem.  The more the government redistributes, the more it undermines the ability of new technology to boost growth.

Every dime of government spending is either taxed or borrowed from the private sector.  And it is this spending, this taxation and deficit spending, that crowds out the private sector, preventing it from growing and creating even more wealth.

Investment isn't the problem, either.  If businesses aren't investing enough then there would be shortages of something, but there aren't any shortages....except, maybe, of commonsense.

So, how about some commonsense?  When an entrepreneur boosts productivity, supply increases at a lower price.  This boost in productivity leads to more profits and incomes for businesses and employees.  But if profits and incomes are taxed and borrowed, the benefits of the new technology don't fully reach the economy and aren't fully reinvested towards future growth. Remember the story of the people on the island?

Instead government is redistributing them to those with a higher propensity to spend, which boosts spending, but not investment.

If the US goal is to encourage more investment, then government spending (crowding out) must be reduced.  Of course, Goolsbee doesn't see it this way.  As a result, he is really part of the problem, not a part of the solution.  Want a bigger economy?  Then cut the size of government. It's the only way.

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist
Robert Stein, CFA – Deputy Chief Economist

Click here for PDF version

Posted on Monday, October 3, 2016 @ 10:31 AM • Post Link Share: 
Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L. P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. First Trust has no knowledge of and has not been provided any information regarding any investor. Financial advisors must determine whether particular investments are appropriate for their clients. First Trust believes the financial advisor is a fiduciary, is capable of evaluating investment risks independently and is responsible for exercising independent judgment with respect to its retirement plan clients.
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA.
First Trust Advisors L.P.
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2018 All rights reserved.