|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
|
|
Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
|
|
 | The ISM Manufacturing index fell to a still strong 55.5 |
|
|
Implications: The factory sector expanded for the 12th consecutive month in July. The ISM manufacturing index fell slightly to 55.5, but according to the Institute for Supply Management, July's index level is consistent with real GDP growth of 4.5% annually. Forward-looking indicators are still up, with the new orders index at 53.5 and supplier deliveries index rising to 58.3 (the higher the number, the slower are deliveries). The employment index has been above 50 since December 2009. During those eight consecutive months it has averaged 56.2 – better than any eight month period since early in 2005. Look for another manufacturing payroll gain in July (reported Friday). On the inflation front, the prices paid index remains at elevated levels above 50 signaling that inflation, not deflation is in the cards. Every day the Fed holds rates near zero, monetary policy becomes more and more of a threat for future price increases. In other news, construction spending increased 0.1% in June. This was well above consensus estimates, but including revisions to previous months construction fell 0.7%. State and local construction was up 1.1% in June, residential building was down 0.8%, mostly due to a drop in home improvements, and commercial construction fell 0.5%.
Click here to view the entire report.
|
|
|
These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
|
|
Archive
Search by Topic
|
|
|
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
|